12/8/2023 0 Comments 3dcoat forumThe car is just one example, there are hundreds of shapes out there that have similar surfaces. Just think, a program powerful and world-famous as Zbrush, still does not have the ability to let you easily model cars. Because, now, would only need to modify, expand, improve, and organize much better existing tools. Objects composed of curved surfaces! There is nothing that replaces the SubD technique.with its very hard learning curve, the incredible daily slowness in working (it takes 30 minutes to get a topologically perfect bolt! Whereas with voxels, for example, you can do it in 5 minutes).ģDCoat is perhaps the program that comes closest to introducing a new modeling paradigm in the future. What is needed in 3Dcoat, IMHO? What can it distinguish itself from others with? What can't you easily do with 3Dcoat, Zbrush, and other software born for artistic purposes? The bottom line is that in my opinion SDFs are not as revolutionary a feature as they appear.although, of course, they have advantages and peculiarities, such as being able to see shapes being created live.įor now they rely mostly on Boolean operations. However, priorities are to be kept in mind in the programming work, which is slow and laborious (I imagine): if efforts are put into the implementation of the SDF they will not be put into something else. You were right to propose it one must have the courage to make the proposals that one thinks are appropriate. Also because things can be hybridized at some point for ultimate benefits that make everyone happy. ![]() Some SDF works of Mikko Sinisalo, made and rendered with MagicaCSG (videos are best viewed on Twitter for better quality): Technical info can be found on the site of math wizard Inigo Quilez. There's a Junior Technical Artist who is developing an SDF add-on via Blender's Python API.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |